Contact Us Site Map

Foundation Conversation

navigation - About CIC
navigation - Conferences and Events
navigation - Projects and Services
navigation - Tuition Exchange Program
navigation - For Presidents and CAOs
navigation - Making the Case
navigation - Publications

click for a printer friendly version

Keynote Address
2003 Foundation Conversation Meeting
March 21, 2003
New York, NY

Eugene M. Lang
Chairman, E.M. Lang Foundation and
Founder, Project Pericles

Thank you very much.

I feel very privileged to participate in this timely conference that CIC is so uniquely qualified to host. Let me preface my remarks with a penetrating glimpse into the obvious — I’m not an educator — I’m a retired businessman who, with lots of luck, parlayed the streets of East Harlem during the Great Depression into a good education and a rewarding business. Forty years ago, I digressed into education when my bank balance tended to compensate for my amateur status as an academic. I established my family Foundation into whose full time employ I retired 6 years ago.

This occupation — my family calls it the obsession of an old guy who doesn’t know when to quit — this occupation stems from a conviction that every major problem of our country — economic, social and political — is at least partly rooted in the condition of education — of its institutions and its people — of its quality, content and accessibility. Accordingly, I see education as a primary medium for addressing the social concerns of our changing society — concerns for which there are no quick fixes. Central to this broad and perhaps amorphous charge to education, I envision liberal arts colleges taking a leadership, perhaps even THE leadership role. My occupation and resources have been primarily directed to that purpose.

This may be painting with an oversized brush — but why be intimidated by size? A practical idea that effectively answers a basic and recognized social need will feed on its own success, and attract partners and resources to generate ongoing replication. This was and continues to be the story of the “I Have A Dream” Program that I started 22 years ago with a class of sixth grade graduates of disadvantaged children in East Harlem. The experience of my Dreamers has become a nationwide program. Far beyond its label, the Program has directly and indirectly benefited and continues to benefit millions of children — putative dropouts and underachievers, to whom college and significant careers have become credible goals. Along the way, some 200 colleges and universities have been constructively involved, supporting IHAD relationships of project sponsors and their Dreamers.

This experience encourages me to share with you the vision of Project Pericles — a practical concept, designed to encourage and facilitate the commitment of colleges to make education for socially responsible and participatory citizenship an essential part of their educational programs — to provide a learning experience that gives students a foundation for social and civic involvement, and fosters a conviction that democratic institutions and processes offer each person the best opportunity to improve the condition of society.

Project Pericles responds to a national concern --- the increasing disengagement over recent decades of young Americans from civic nvolvement. This concern has been extensively studied and reported. It reflects disenchantment with the efficacy and personal relevance of our social and political institutions in coping with social issues. Frequently cited is the fact that, in the last presidential election, less than one third of eligible voters under 25 actually voted. Clearly, students should be motivated and prepared for civic participation in an expanding pluralistic society.

Colleges and universities have recognized this concern and its corrosive impact on the quality and ultimate viability of our democratic processes. They have responded in ways that attract the idealism and involvement of tudents. In fact, some 70% of college undergraduates are said to be engaged in some element of community service. However, with notable exceptions, these involvements have been random, functioning at the periphery of curricula with little accountability for performance. In parallel, liberal arts curricula have retreated to accommodate occupational priorities of the marketplace.

This curricular retreat associates basically with the theme of this conference, “The Liberal Arts College Role and Responsibilities in a Democratic Society.” It takes me back about five years when Steve Graubard, editor of Daedalus, asked me to write an article on the state of liberal arts colleges. I remember questioning whether the academy of Daedalus readers would take my comments seriously. Steve said, “Not to worry! Just have plenty of footnotes.” My article, well-footnoted, appeared in the Winter 1999 issue. Essentially, it responded to three questions. First, have liberal arts colleges lost their relevance and do they face extinction? Second, if so, does it matter? Third, are there options for survival? To the first question, I answered “Maybe.” To the second, I answered, “Yes.” To the third — options for survival — I answered “Perhaps,” with a proposal that liberal arts colleges revitalize their essential mission with (and I quote) “a broad agenda of preparing students for responsible citizenship, and, as a primary building block, carrying out projects that address specific community needs.”

Later, when I reread the proposal in cold type, I realized that it was much less than meaningful — most schools and students were already involved in their communities, but with no evident impact on civic attitude. I asked myself, “What conditions could be established to improve the odds for success of a program to instill in its participants an abiding sense of civic motivation?” My thoughts included institutional commitment, active and sustained implementation, responsible direction, comprehensive involvement, accountability, evaluation. These features would add meaningful elements of substance, psychology and performance to most socially oriented initiatives. They were to become the ingredients of basic policies that now characterize Project Pericles.

Project Pericles presents a challenge. It invites all colleges — eventually, I hope as Pericleans — to include learning opportunities in and out of the classroom that give students the intellectual and experiential foundation for responsible citizenship; and, in doing so, to create a supportive institutional environment. And let me pause to acknowledge the presence of three Periclean colleagues, Ellen Hurwitz of New England College, John Strassburger of Ursinus College and David Caputo of Pace University. The collective experience of our ten pilot Pericleans is leading the way for roject Pericles to establish its identity and, in due course, to facilitate the rites of passage for new Pericleans.

The distinctive force of Project Pericles derives from five basic policies within which Periclean Programs are developed and conducted. To summarize them briefly: First, there must be institutional commitment — trustees formally commit their colleges to make education for responsible citizenship a regular part of their educational programs, curricular and co-curricular. Second, trustees establish a board committee — perhaps titled Committee of Civic and Social Responsibility — that is charged to oversee implementation of the commitment. Third, under coordinated direction, an ongoing educational and experiential Program --- always spelled with a capital P — is developed that, over time, embraces classroom, campus and community. Fourth, reflecting the fact of institutional commitment, Programs are designed to encourage involvements of all college constituencies — trustees, administrators, faculty, students and alumni. All are presumed to have an equity in the Program. Fifth, Programs are centrally administered, with their contents, as practical, having defined objectives, standards of performance and criteria for evaluation.

Each Periclean creates and administers its own Program within the framework of the five policies. Program development and improvement is an ongoing process. Project Pericles facilitates the interaction of Pericleans and exchange of Program data and experience. The guidance and assistance of outside educational service organizations is encouraged — and I gladly note, CIC and Campus Compact are very respected and valued colleagues of Project Pericles.

During 2000 and 2001, I met with many hundreds of college presidents, faculty members, educational and civic functionaries, getting reactions to the Periclean concept. A group of friends joined me as a planning committee to consider the details, organization and policies. We settled on an action program that, after much discussion, was titled Project Pericles. Again, I must note the cooperation of CIC — Allen Splete and his successor Richard Ekman — that enabled Project Pericles to learn so much from so many of you.

Finally, from among the colleges whose presidents had indicated a strong interest in Project Pericles, I invited a diverse group of ten to become our first — our pilot Pericleans. On December 14, 2000, I sent an invitation to their ten presidents for an all-day conference in New York, on January 17, 2001. We were to decide whether Project Pericles was ready for action. My cordial invitation to each president included a caveat — if you come, please bring your Chairman. Despite universal good intentions, the prospect of getting ten college presidents and their chairmen to a New York meeting on 30 days notice was equivalent to organizing a conjuncture of the planets. But on January 17, everybody showed up — although we were compromised by two vice-chairmen.

We discussed our way through a crowded agenda and decided to join together as Pericleans, bonded by a shared objective and bound by the policies designed to make Project Pericles fly. Over past two years, Project Pericles and Pericleans have come together — we know that we are on the right track — Programs and Program ideas have been developed, tested and exchanged. Conferences and cooperative planning of Periclean presidents, provosts, and faculty have fostered program esprit and involvements. A Presidents’ Council — the ten Periclean presidents, chaired by Leo Lambert of Elon University, was formed as an advisory adjunct. In two weeks, we will be having our first Periclean Conference — he ten Pericleans will be sending some 140 delegates that uniquely will include representatives of all constituencies.

Project Pericles is not yet ready for new members — but it won’t be long. Meanwhile, we’re excited and united by our purpose of effecting a transformation of American education that will contribute to a rising tide of new socially responsible and participatory citizens.

Thank you.



back to top

Copyright ©1997-2008 Council of Independent Colleges. All rights reserved.